Resumen
Los paisajes culturales representan una red de relaciones estrechas entre personas, acontecimientos y lugares a lo largo del tiempo: son un símbolo del reconocimiento creciente de los vínculos fundamentales entre las comunidades locales y su patrimonio, entre las personas y el entorno natural y, por consiguiente, cruciales para su identidad. En proyectos arquitectónicos como los de reconstrucción tras una catástrofe, que giran en torno a las necesidades de comunidades diezmadas por un desastre, las decisiones adoptadas se vuelven especialmente críticas, ya que tienen un impacto a largo plazo en la comunidad y su entorno construido. Por consiguiente, hay que tener en cuenta el contexto cultural, social y medioambiental. Este artículo analiza el caso de Khokana, un asentamiento newari tradicional en el valle de Katmandú, para estudiar su configuración espacial, determinada por sus actividades socioculturales, a través de la perspectiva de la memoria colectiva. Por otra parte, se analizan las repercusiones que tuvo el terremoto de Nepal de 2015 en los valores inmateriales y el entorno construido de la comunidad; asimismo se propone la reconfiguración de los proyectos mediante la comprensión del sistema de conocimientos y las prácticas tradicionales de Khokana. En la última parte se propone un modelo para conseguir una mayor adaptabilidad comunitaria manteniendo intactos sus valores y ética del espacio.Citas
Baer, Sebastian Norbert; Sabbioni, Cristina; and Sors, Andre. 1991. Science, Technology and European Cultural Heritage. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Beer, Michael; Kougioumtzoglou, A Ioannis; Patelli, Edoardo; and Au, Siu-Kui. Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Bhandari Bhakta, Roshan. 2014. Social capital in disaster risk management: A case study of social capital mobilization following the 1934 Kathmandu Valley earthquake in Nepal. Disaster Prevention and Management, vol. 23, 4: 314-328.
Cannon, Terry; Twigg, John; and Rowell, Jennifer. 2003. Social Vulnerability, Sustainable Livelihoods and Disaster. Report to DFID Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance Department, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254398816_Social_Vulnerability_Sustainable_Livelihoods_and_Disasters (consulted on 10/08/2020).
Cilliers, Juanne Elizelle; and Cilliers, Sarel. 2013. Planning for sustainable communities: Layout and design approaches. 49th ISOCARP Congress: Frontiers of Planning – Evolving and declining models of city planning practice. The Hague: ISOCARP.
Clemente, Matteo; and Salvati, Luca. 2017. “Interrupted” Landscapes: Post-Earthquake Reconstruction in between Urban Renewal and Social Identity of Local Communities. Sustainability, vol. 9, 11.
Clinton Jefferson, William. 2006. Lessons Learned from Tsunami Recovery: Key Propositions for Building Back Better. New York: Office of the UN Secretary-General’s Special Envoy for Tsunami Recovery, https://www.preventionweb.net/files/2054_VL108301.pdf (consulted on 15/08/2020)
Dixit, Mani Amod; Parajuli, Krishna Yogeshwor; and Guragain, Ramesh. 2004. Indigenous skills and practices of earthquake resistant construction in Nepal. Proceedings of 13rd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver: 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Secretariat.
Environmental Camps for Conservation Awareness. 2016. Khokana Earthquake Debris Removal Initiative. Lalitpur, Bagmati: Environmental Camps for Conservation Awareness, https://www.globalgiving.org/pfil/21513/projdoc.pdf (consulted on 15/08/2020).
Gieryn, Thomas F. 2000. A Space for Place in Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 463-496.
Government of Nepal. 1996. Khokana, the vernacular village and its mustard-oil seed industrial heritage. Katmandú: Department of Archaeology of the Ministry of Youth, Sports and Culture of the Government of Nepal, https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/844/ (consulted on (07/08/2020).
Hiller Bill, Hanson Julienne. 1989. Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hull R, Bruce. 1992. Image Congruity, Place Attachment and Community Design. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, vol. 9, 3:.181-192.
ICCROM. 2000. Riga Charter on authenticity and historical reconstruction in relationship to cultural heritage. Riga: ICCROM, Latvian National Commission for UNESCO and State Inspection for Heritage Protection of Latvia, https://www.iccrom.org/sites/default/files/publications/2020-05/convern8_07_rigacharter_ing.pdf (consulted on 12/08/2020).
ICOMOS. 1999. International Cultural Tourism Charter: Managing Tourism at Places of Heritage Significance. Mexico: ICOMOS, https://www.icomos.org/charters/tourism_e.pdf (consulted on 10/08/2020).
Karuppannan, Sadasivam; Kc, Chandani; and Sivam, Alpana. 2019. Importance of Cultural Heritage in Post-Disaster Setting. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, vol. 2, 2: 429-442.
Khalaf W, Roha. 2017. A viewpoint on the reconstruction of destroyed UNESCO Cultural World Heritage Sites. International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 23, 3: 261-274.
Lawrence, L. Denise; and Low, M. Setha. 1990. The Built Environment and Spatial Form. Annu Rev Anthropol, vol. 19: 453-505.
Lekakis, Stelios; Shakya, Shobhit; and Kostakis, Vasilis. 2018. Bringing the Community Back: A Case Study of the Post-Earthquake Heritage Restoration in Kathmandu Valley. Sustainability, vol. 10, 8: 1-17.
National Planning Commission of Nepal. 2015. Post Disaster Needs Assessment, vol. B. Katmandú: National Planning Commission of Nepal, https://www.npc.gov.np/images/category/PDNA_volume_BFinalVersion.pdf (consulted on 10/08/2020).
National Research Institute for Cultural Properties of Japan. 2016. Project for Investigation of Damage Situation of Cultural Heritage in Nepal. Tokyo: Japan Center for International Cooperation in Conservation, National Research Institute for Cultural Properties.
Nocca, Francesca. 2017. The Role of Cultural Heritage in Sustainable Development: Multidimensional Indicators as Decision-Making Tool. Sustainability, vol. 9, 10.
Relph, Edward. 1976. Place and Placelessness. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publishing Ltd.
Ruskin, John. 1849. The Seven Lamps of Architecture. Boston: Dana Estes & Company.
Saruwono, Masran; Mohammad, Mastura Nik; and Said, Yani Shahrul. 2013. A Sense of Place within the Landscape in Cultural Settings. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol.105: 506-512.
Sharma, Keshab; Kc, Apil; Subedi, Mandip; and Pokharel, Bigul. 2018. Challenges for reconstruction after Mw 7.8 Gorkha earthquake: a study on a devastated area of Nepal. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, vol. 9, 1: 760-790.
Taylor, Ken; and Lennon, Lousie Jane. 2011. Cultural Landscapes: A bridge between culture and nature? International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 17, 6: 537-554.
Ujang Norsidah, Zakariya Khalilah. 2014. The Notion of Place, Place Meaning, and Identity in Urban Regeneration. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol.170: 709-717.
Upadhyay, Anir; Yoshida, Harunori; and Rijal, Bahadur Hom. 2006. Climate Responsive Building Design in the Kathmandu Valley. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, vol.5, 1: 169-176.
UNESCO. 2014. Education strategy 2014-2021. Paris: UNESCO, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000231288 (consulted on 10/08/2020).
UNESCO; and The World Bank. 2018. Culture in City, Reconstruction and Recovery. Paris and Washington D.C.: UNESCO and The World Bank, http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/708271541534427317/pdf/131856-WP-REVISED-II-PUBLIC.pdf (consulted on 20/08/2020).
UNISDR. 2017. Build back better in recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction. Geneva: UNISDR, https://www.unisdr.org/files/53213_bbb.pdf (consulted on 10/08/2020).
United Nations. 2008. Achieving Sustainable Development and Promoting Development Cooperation: Dialogues at the Economic and Social Council. New York: United Nations, https://www.un.org/en/ecosoc/docs/pdfs/fina_08-45773.pdf (consulted on 09/08/2020).

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2020 Komal Rokka, Sanjeev Singh