AbstractCultural landscapes represent a closely woven net of inter-relationships between people, events and places over time; they are a symbol of the growing recognition of the fundamental links between local communities and their heritage, between people and their natural environment, and are hence crucial to their identity. In architectural projects like post-disaster reconstruction, which revolves around the needs of the communities decimated by a disaster, decisions taken become especially critical, as they have a long-term impact on the community and its built environment. It therefore requires one to take into account the cultural, social, and environmental context. This paper considers the case of Khokana, a traditional Newari settlement in the Kathmandu valley, in order to study its spatial configuration, determined by its socio-cultural activities, through the lens of collective memory mapping. It further analyzes the repercussions on the intangible values and tangible built environment of the community following the 2015 Nepal earthquake, and proposes a new design approach based on an understanding of Khokana’s traditional knowledge system and practices. Finally, we propose a model to achieve community resilience while keeping the community’s values and spatial ethos intact.
Baer, Sebastian Norbert; Sabbioni, Cristina; and Sors, Andre. 1991. Science, Technology and European Cultural Heritage. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Beer, Michael; Kougioumtzoglou, A Ioannis; Patelli, Edoardo; and Au, Siu-Kui. Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Bhandari Bhakta, Roshan. 2014. Social capital in disaster risk management: A case study of social capital mobilization following the 1934 Kathmandu Valley earthquake in Nepal. Disaster Prevention and Management, vol. 23, 4: 314-328.
Cannon, Terry; Twigg, John; and Rowell, Jennifer. 2003. Social Vulnerability, Sustainable Livelihoods and Disaster. Report to DFID Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance Department, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254398816_Social_Vulnerability_Sustainable_Livelihoods_and_Disasters (consulted on 10/08/2020).
Cilliers, Juanne Elizelle; and Cilliers, Sarel. 2013. Planning for sustainable communities: Layout and design approaches. 49th ISOCARP Congress: Frontiers of Planning – Evolving and declining models of city planning practice. The Hague: ISOCARP.
Clemente, Matteo; and Salvati, Luca. 2017. “Interrupted” Landscapes: Post-Earthquake Reconstruction in between Urban Renewal and Social Identity of Local Communities. Sustainability, vol. 9, 11.
Clinton Jefferson, William. 2006. Lessons Learned from Tsunami Recovery: Key Propositions for Building Back Better. New York: Office of the UN Secretary-General’s Special Envoy for Tsunami Recovery, https://www.preventionweb.net/files/2054_VL108301.pdf (consulted on 15/08/2020)
Dixit, Mani Amod; Parajuli, Krishna Yogeshwor; and Guragain, Ramesh. 2004. Indigenous skills and practices of earthquake resistant construction in Nepal. Proceedings of 13rd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver: 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Secretariat.
Environmental Camps for Conservation Awareness. 2016. Khokana Earthquake Debris Removal Initiative. Lalitpur, Bagmati: Environmental Camps for Conservation Awareness, https://www.globalgiving.org/pfil/21513/projdoc.pdf (consulted on 15/08/2020).
Gieryn, Thomas F. 2000. A Space for Place in Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 463-496.
Government of Nepal. 1996. Khokana, the vernacular village and its mustard-oil seed industrial heritage. Katmandú: Department of Archaeology of the Ministry of Youth, Sports and Culture of the Government of Nepal, https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/844/ (consulted on (07/08/2020).
Hiller Bill, Hanson Julienne. 1989. Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hull R, Bruce. 1992. Image Congruity, Place Attachment and Community Design. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, vol. 9, 3:.181-192.
ICCROM. 2000. Riga Charter on authenticity and historical reconstruction in relationship to cultural heritage. Riga: ICCROM, Latvian National Commission for UNESCO and State Inspection for Heritage Protection of Latvia, https://www.iccrom.org/sites/default/files/publications/2020-05/convern8_07_rigacharter_ing.pdf (consulted on 12/08/2020).
ICOMOS. 1999. International Cultural Tourism Charter: Managing Tourism at Places of Heritage Significance. Mexico: ICOMOS, https://www.icomos.org/charters/tourism_e.pdf (consulted on 10/08/2020).
Karuppannan, Sadasivam; Kc, Chandani; and Sivam, Alpana. 2019. Importance of Cultural Heritage in Post-Disaster Setting. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, vol. 2, 2: 429-442.
Khalaf W, Roha. 2017. A viewpoint on the reconstruction of destroyed UNESCO Cultural World Heritage Sites. International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 23, 3: 261-274.
Lawrence, L. Denise; and Low, M. Setha. 1990. The Built Environment and Spatial Form. Annu Rev Anthropol, vol. 19: 453-505.
Lekakis, Stelios; Shakya, Shobhit; and Kostakis, Vasilis. 2018. Bringing the Community Back: A Case Study of the Post-Earthquake Heritage Restoration in Kathmandu Valley. Sustainability, vol. 10, 8: 1-17.
National Planning Commission of Nepal. 2015. Post Disaster Needs Assessment, vol. B. Katmandú: National Planning Commission of Nepal, https://www.npc.gov.np/images/category/PDNA_volume_BFinalVersion.pdf (consulted on 10/08/2020).
National Research Institute for Cultural Properties of Japan. 2016. Project for Investigation of Damage Situation of Cultural Heritage in Nepal. Tokyo: Japan Center for International Cooperation in Conservation, National Research Institute for Cultural Properties.
Nocca, Francesca. 2017. The Role of Cultural Heritage in Sustainable Development: Multidimensional Indicators as Decision-Making Tool. Sustainability, vol. 9, 10.
Relph, Edward. 1976. Place and Placelessness. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publishing Ltd.
Ruskin, John. 1849. The Seven Lamps of Architecture. Boston: Dana Estes & Company.
Saruwono, Masran; Mohammad, Mastura Nik; and Said, Yani Shahrul. 2013. A Sense of Place within the Landscape in Cultural Settings. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol.105: 506-512.
Sharma, Keshab; Kc, Apil; Subedi, Mandip; and Pokharel, Bigul. 2018. Challenges for reconstruction after Mw 7.8 Gorkha earthquake: a study on a devastated area of Nepal. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, vol. 9, 1: 760-790.
Taylor, Ken; and Lennon, Lousie Jane. 2011. Cultural Landscapes: A bridge between culture and nature? International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 17, 6: 537-554.
Ujang Norsidah, Zakariya Khalilah. 2014. The Notion of Place, Place Meaning, and Identity in Urban Regeneration. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol.170: 709-717.
Upadhyay, Anir; Yoshida, Harunori; and Rijal, Bahadur Hom. 2006. Climate Responsive Building Design in the Kathmandu Valley. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, vol.5, 1: 169-176.
UNESCO. 2014. Education strategy 2014-2021. Paris: UNESCO, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000231288 (consulted on 10/08/2020).
UNESCO; and The World Bank. 2018. Culture in City, Reconstruction and Recovery. Paris and Washington D.C.: UNESCO and The World Bank, http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/708271541534427317/pdf/131856-WP-REVISED-II-PUBLIC.pdf (consulted on 20/08/2020).
UNISDR. 2017. Build back better in recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction. Geneva: UNISDR, https://www.unisdr.org/files/53213_bbb.pdf (consulted on 10/08/2020).
United Nations. 2008. Achieving Sustainable Development and Promoting Development Cooperation: Dialogues at the Economic and Social Council. New York: United Nations, https://www.un.org/en/ecosoc/docs/pdfs/fina_08-45773.pdf (consulted on 09/08/2020).